🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion say that indecision on how best to address the problem is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being swallowed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue sets out a range of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer locations. Officials say it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. People will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves in search of treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline is situated the grave of a ex-soldier killed while working abroad. His parent expressed she could not sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to consider this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Certainty

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Some want more coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to continue for now. Different voices argue the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with residents.”

He added there was time to consider all the options. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. We need good community discussions to find the right answers for each village.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sadness for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in life after death, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.